Regulation Didn't Save Canada's Banks

May 7, 2009

The Wall Street Journal, Marie-Josée Kravis--

Canada's five largest banks would pass the U.S. government stress test brilliantly. They were profitable in the last quarter of 2008, are well capitalized now, and have had no problems raising additional private capital. On average only 7% of their mortgage portfolios consisted of subprime loans (versus 20% in the U.S.). And no major Canadian bank has required direct government infusions of capital.

Advocates of increased regulation of U.S. financial markets have concluded that more stringent rules governing leverage and capital ratios account for Canada's impressive performance. They champion such measures here. In a Toronto speech earlier this year about reforming the U.S. banking system, former Fed chairman and Obama administration adviser Paul Volcker said the model he is considering "looks more like the Canadian system than it does the American system."

Nevertheless, Canadian banks operate in a very different context. Copying the Canadian banking system in this country, without understanding how its banking and housing sectors operate, would be a mistake.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124165325829393691.html#mod=djemEditoria...

Ms. Kravis is a fellow at the Hudson institute.

Read more:



2 Comments

Know Thy Neighbor: What Canada Can tell Us About Financial Regulation
Pietro S. Nivola and John C. Courtney, The Brookings Institution

http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/0423_canada_nivola.aspx?emc=lm&m=22...

CNN: Stress tests: Banks need $75 billion

Ten of the [American] nation's 19 largest banks will need to raise a total of $74.6 billion in capital, federal officials announced Thursday, bringing an end to relentless speculation about how much more money the nation's leading banks would need to withstand the recession.

Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/07/news/companies/stress_test_announcement/...