The North American Auto Industry
Case Synopsis
Going back to the U.S.-Canada Auto Pact of the mid-1960s, the automobile industry is perhaps the most highly integrated industry in the North American regional economy. At the same time, Isabel Studer, a well-known expert on the North American auto industry from Mexico, argues that the industry has not taken sufficient advantage of the benefits held out by the NAFTA accord to secure its competitive future. Pioneering "just-in-time production" and focusing on intrafirm trade across the two North American internal borders, this highly concentrated industry (identified most closely with The Big Three) was poised to lead the way towards greater gains through integration under NAFTA. Following deregulation, companies invested heavily in Mexico in the 1980s and 90s to bring their plants up to higher technological standards, while benefiting from flexible labor arrangements and low wages. The companies also benefited from the highly efficient and modernized Canadian plants, and their reliable workforce, and Canadian subsidiaries enjoyed a favorable exchange rate for their exports back into the U.S. market. Finally, the Big Three focused on producing a limited product line for the North American market, while the continentalization of the market provided economies of scale.
The Big Three won stringent rules of origin in the NAFTA agreement, which put them in a better position vis a vis Asian competitors, and their strategies helped them weather the 1994-95 Mexican peso crisis. All the same, Studer points out a number of factors undermining this advantageous position moving forward from the mid-1990s. First, Japanese competition continues to threaten the competitive edge of the industry. Second, Mexico expanded its bilateral trade agreements and liberalized access to its market for cars from Europe and Brazil, at the expense of those from its North American partners. Third, the industry remains highly concentrated in the high-cost United States, despite the fears of the ‘giant sucking sound.’ Finally, further integration is stalled because of a lack of regulatory harmonization, and the continuation of the mentality of “national’ markets that politicizes trade and therefore makes the auto industry vulnerable to the protectionist temptation.
Relevant Courses
Apart from courses on NAFTA and North American integration, this essay could bring “North American” content and enhance theoretical discussions in courses in the following subjects:
Political Science
- International Political Economy: unit on the Multinational Corporation. The North American auto industry is, as Studer points out, dominated by the Big 3 (Ford, GM, and Chrysler, the latter now owned by a German firm). It has also stood in as a symbol of all that was right with the U.S. economy in the immediate postwar moment of the 1950s (“What’s Good for General Motors is Good for the USA”), and all that was wrong with the U.S. economy under globalization (Ross Perot’s “giant sucking sound,” and other critiques of corporate greed and lack of social responsibility). Can be used as a case study for how corporations can adapt to a more competitive global environment (as the Big Three did by continentalizing production in the 1980s and 90s, leading up to NAFTA).
- Globalization:unit on labor rights and transnational civil society. Studer’s piece is focused on the competitiveness of the Big Three, but the issue of Mexico’s wage advantage – and whether corporations’ labor practices can or should be policed across borders – is related to the growth of factory jobs in the auto industry in Mexico. Observers have noted that big corporations are no longer building branch plants, but rather subcontracting. Students can research how this aspect of the auto industry has also changed in the past two decades.
- Borders/Transborder Studies: Studer’s piece can be paired with one of the Teaching Modules/Backgrounders on transportation infrastructure (i.e., Prentice, Brooks, or Eaton) to discuss how an industry integrates continentally, and how infrastructure is a crucial part of those strategies – both their early success, and their later stagnation as governments fail to fund road paving and standards harmonization that would enable inputs to move more efficiently across borders.
Useful Links from PNA
- Do Cross-Border Regions Matter for Trade – Canada-US Border Effects and Cross-Border Regions
- Fixing the Potholes in North American Transportation Systems
- Globalization: Myths, Facts, and Consequences
- Governance Structure, Corporate Decision Making and Firm Performance in North America
- Mexican Employment, Productivity, and Income a Decade After NAFTA
- The North American Auto Industry
Suggested Bibliography
Anastakis, Dimitry (2005). Auto Pact: Creating a Borderless North American Auto Industry, 196-1971. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Babson, Steve and Huberto Juarex Nunex, coordinadores, (1998). Enfrentando el cambio: Obreros del automovil y produccion esbelta en American del Norte (Confronting Change: Auto labor and lean production in North America). Puebla, Mexic: Benemerita Universidad Autnoma de Puebla; Wayne State Unversity Press.
Hon, Kam, David Schroeder, and Walter Schroeder (2004). Trends in the North American Auto Industry. Toronto, Ont.: DBRS.
Maynard, Micheline (2003). The End of Detroit: How the Big Three Lost Their Grip on the American Car Market. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
Perot, Ross with Pat Choate (1993). Save your job, Save our country: Why NAFTA Must be Stopped --Now!. New York: Hyperion.
Studer, Isabel (2002). Ford and the Global Strategies of Multinationals: The North American Auto Industry. New York: Routledge.
Weintraub, Sidney and Christopher Sands, eds., (1998). The North American Auto Industry Under NAFTA. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
From: Study Group on “Mapping the New North American Reality” In cooperation with the Government of Quebec, the Government of Canada, The Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), and HEC-Montreal Montreal, November 2003
Published in: Mapping the New North American Reality, IRPP Working Paper Series 2004-09p
Note: PNA is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our members. Comments are moderated by PNA, in accordance with the PNA Comment Policy. PNA does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted below.
1 Comment
Each Teaching Note is geared towards a variety of disciplines and can benefit from feedback by instructors.
Please help enhance this Teaching Note - to share with the community how you've used this resource and what teaching methods were most effective, we invite you to become a member of Portal for North America.
