The Quiet Reality of North American Energy Interdependence

by Guy Stanley
Subject:Energy and Environment

Case Synopsis

In this piece, Joseph Dukert, a leading independent energy consultant, reveals what has been hidden in plain sight: that in North America, we are well on our way towards a single, integrated market for energy. It is not only that Canada is the top source of imported petroleum for the United States, another reality that is not well known in the U.S.; rather, it is the fact that all three countries produce highly-valued sources of energy (oil, natural gas, hydro) and also consume one another’s energy exports.

In one evocative example, Dukert points out that Mexican electricity generators are powered by U.S. gas, then re-export the electricity they produce back across the border. Transborder pipelines and power lines also are emblematic of the level of trilateral cooperation which, in this issue area, borders on European levels of policy coordination and common standards. Moreover, the patterns of interdependence are not dominated by the asymmetrical pull of a power-hungry U.S. draining the supplies of its more dependent neighbors. There is variation across Canadian provinces, and Mexico’s plans for more pipelines could benefit its own product as well as its consumers.

Following a typically North American pattern – lack of top-down direction and institutionalization following de facto integration – North America’s energy markets have linked up without any supranational coordination or machinery. Dukert is most insistent on the innovative and underappreciated nature of North American energy cooperation. In terms of institutions, in addition to the summits of ministers in the North American Energy Working Group, there is also the North American Electricity Reliability Council (NERC), which Dukert notes is a hybrid public-private forum but is itself a unique non-governmental organization.

Even a series of setbacks – the Enron scandal, the 2003 blackout, etc. – have not derailed this movement towards an integrated continental market for, and policy regime regarding, energy. Citizens of all three countries benefit in terms of efficiency gains and joint environmental standards, but also through the joint management of energy and the security of supply it guarantees throughout the continent. And it should be noted, Dukert says, that this cooperation happens despite the different regimes of ownership of energy resources and energy companies across the three NAFTA countries.

Rather than looking for a single North American energy policy per se, what we see is a series of convergences and “conscious parallelism,” driven by convergences in national political and economic interests. Politically, this is driven by regional groupings of governors and provincial premiers; there is also impetus towards greater integration coming from the private sector, both energy and non-energy (the latter looking for cheaper inputs). Dukert thinks the final piece will be trilateral meeting of legislative leaders, who may also line up in regional groupings to press for more efficient and integrated energy markets to benefit their constituencies and, at the same time, benefiting the continent as a whole.

Questions for Discussion

  1. Why are commodity production, subsoil rights, and utility ownership so often concentrated in the hands of the state? What is the track record of foreign investment in these areas?
  2. Students may be asked to consider these two possibly incompatible imperatives within NAFTA: keeping the border closed to terrorists (and illegal workers), but open for legal commerce. How might the three NAFTA countries view their border to reconcile these two competing goals? Students could investigate what has been done to date, in the Canada-U.S. Smart Border Accord and the Mexican-U.S. Border Partnership (see below).

Relevant Courses

Apart from courses on NAFTA and North American integration, this essay could bring “North American” content and enhance theoretical discussions in courses in the following subjects:

Political Science

  • International Political Economy: units on trade liberalization and regional economic integration, globalization; particularly useful for discussing how regional economic systems are built via infrastructure and via the political power of interest groups, as well as broader structural contextual variables such as geography or the broader patterns in the national and global economies. Also could be used in a unit on Natural Resource Management, and compared with work on “the oil curse,” in the context of asking if, by integrating markets regionally both before and after NAFTA, Mexico has avoided this curse. Could be used to discuss commodities and their role in the global economy.
  • Globalization/Global Issues: Could be useful in a discussion of the role of oil in the world economy, linked to the measures of U.S. power. It also discusses the issue of regulatory harmonization, which is a politically loaded issue in national contexts where sovereignty and policy autonomy are viewed as sacred values that national governments must protect. This can also play in to a unit on “Whither the Nation-State?” as Dukert’s analysis shows that subnational units, as well as non-governmental and international organizations – i.e.., technically “non-state actors” are taking a leading role in the governance of the international economy and particular sectors, such as energy.
  • Specialized Courses on Borders and Transborder Studies: Dukert’s discussion of the link between regional energy interdependence and national energy security raises the issue of the convergence of these two scales of interest. It also raises questions about post 9.11 border security – integrated energy markets depend upon the ability to ship energy supplies across borders – which would be jeopardized if borders were made unduly hard to cross, either through paperwork or through physical barriers to entry.

Suggested Bibliography

Bradley, Paul G. (2003). Canada and the U.S.: A Seamless Energy Border? Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

Canada. National Energy Board (2001). North American Natural Gas Liquids, Pricing and Convergence: An Energy Market Assessment. Calgary, AB: National Energy Board.

Polczer, Shaun (2008). "Canadian oil expected to be U.S. election issue." Edmonton Journal. June 9.

Serletis, Apostolos (2007). Quantitative and Empirical Analysis of Energy Markets. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Pub. Co..

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Resources. Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources (2005). The Vast North American Resource Potential of Oil Shale, Oil Sands, and Heavy Oils, Parts 1 and 2: Oversight hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources of the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, June 23, 2005 and June 30, 2005. Washington: U.S. G.P.O..

Suggested Web Resources

Canada-U.S. Border Issues: Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C.:
http://canada.usembassy.gov/.

North American Electricity Reliability Council (NERC):
http://www.nerc.com/.

U.S.-Mexico Binational Working Group on Homeland Security and Border Cooperation:
http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rls/rpt/26208.htm.

From: Study Group on “Mapping the New North American Reality”
In cooperation with the Government of Quebec, the Government of Canada,
The Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), and HEC-Montreal, Montreal, November 2003

Published in: Mapping the New North American Reality, IRPP Working Paper Series 2004-09h

Note: PNA is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our members. Comments are moderated by PNA, in accordance with the PNA Comment Policy. PNA does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted below.

1 Comment

Each Teaching Note is geared towards a variety of disciplines and can benefit from feedback by instructors.

Please help enhance this Teaching Note - to share with the community how you've used this resource and what teaching methods were most effective, we invite you to become a member of Portal for North America.